Monday, October 3, 2005
Half time blog
Holy fucknuts. This is like watching the first 20 minutes of "Saving Private Ryan". We've lost 3 starters, and poor Terrance Murphy may be dead. I feel like I'm writing the report from the apocalypse. The Packers can't get a break, but truth be told you have to make your own breaks. Folks, this is a bad team. The defense consistantly shoots itself in the foot. Whether it's the occasional horriffic play or the dagger like penalties, the defense does enough to lose. The offense has nothing. Green is trying his hardest, but he has no one to block. Davenport can run over one guy but he can't run over six. Favre has no one to throw to. Walker's out, Franks is out, Driver is getting double teamed and Ferguson is absolutelty gutless. Penalties are killing us. And here is the rest of it.
Kill the Kickers
You know, I think I jinxed us this week. Late last week, I had an email exchange with our reader "Anonymous Pats Fan" about how kickers should be removed from the game. There was an article on ESPN.Com talking about it, and we had a friend in college who was a football fanatic (I mean, REALLY crazy.. Like he'd draw up plays in his notebook during class…) who always said how much he hated kickers.. Well, kickers got their revenge on me yesterday…
Here's what I wrote on Friday:
"Seriously though, would anybody MISS kickers? How much more important would 2-point conversions be? And, just to keep the traditional look of football fields with the goal posts... How about instead of kicking the ball through, the QB could throw it through? Hell, teams might invest a roster spot for strong armed QBs to heave 60 yarders pretty often. Even kickoffs could be replaced with thrown balls!"
Josh Brown, kicker for the Seattle Seahawks, missed a 47-yard field goal as time expired yesterday that would have given Seattle a HUGE road win in a game they came back in. *Doink!* Off the left upright. It was the second kick he missed from exactly 47 on the day. The first one he missed wide right.
So I feel even more violently in favor of eliminating kickers today than I did last week. A kicker cost us the game yesterday. We're now 2-2 instead of 3-1 right now because of a kicker. And, who knows, that could come back to haunt us come playoff time. A kicker may have cost us a playoff spot or home field advantage. A fucking kicker.
Oh, and the refs didn't help matters. On 3rd and 10 from the Seattle 33, Brunell threw a pass down the middle of the field. Safety Michael Boulware and receiver Santana Moss both went up for the ball at exactly the same time. Boulware was a little behind and to the side of Moss, but reached his hands through Moss' hands, and knocked the ball away. Penalty flag. Boulware and the Seahawks could not believe the call. Even some of the other refs seemed to be trying to talk the flag-thrower out of the call, as they huddled for several seconds before announcing it. But it was too late. Pass interference. 30+ yard penalty. First down. Redkins score a big touchdown a couple plays later.
Replays clearly showed it was an awful call. Not even "questionable", just awful. Even the announcers (who were clearly Skins fans.. I think I even heard one go "Yes!" under his breath when Brown missed the kick) admitted it was a bad call. Many Skins fans posting on message boards admitted it was a bad call (though there are always a handful of childish fans who won't admit anything that might take away from a win). On NFL Primetime, they actually showed the play (and a replay of it) as part of the brief highlights of the game, and said it was a bad call. The refs screw us. Again.
And apparently, Detroit got screwed even worse. A game-winning touchdown pass by Joey "Come On I Need A Win Before The Lions Fans Lynch Me" Harrington was reversed after instant replay review. It was called a touchdown on the field when the receiver seemingly dragged his knee in bounds in the end zone while catching the ball. Apparently the replay confirmed the call on the field. But, somehow, some way, the referee saw it otherwise. He said the receiver did not have possession in bounds. Call reversed, Lions lose.
I expect the NFL to issue an apology or two today for the bad calls yesterday. But an apology does not turn that loss into a win.
Still, despite the refs sucking, we still had a chance to win that game. But a fucking kicker lost it.
Here's what I wrote on Friday:
"Seriously though, would anybody MISS kickers? How much more important would 2-point conversions be? And, just to keep the traditional look of football fields with the goal posts... How about instead of kicking the ball through, the QB could throw it through? Hell, teams might invest a roster spot for strong armed QBs to heave 60 yarders pretty often. Even kickoffs could be replaced with thrown balls!"
Josh Brown, kicker for the Seattle Seahawks, missed a 47-yard field goal as time expired yesterday that would have given Seattle a HUGE road win in a game they came back in. *Doink!* Off the left upright. It was the second kick he missed from exactly 47 on the day. The first one he missed wide right.
So I feel even more violently in favor of eliminating kickers today than I did last week. A kicker cost us the game yesterday. We're now 2-2 instead of 3-1 right now because of a kicker. And, who knows, that could come back to haunt us come playoff time. A kicker may have cost us a playoff spot or home field advantage. A fucking kicker.
Oh, and the refs didn't help matters. On 3rd and 10 from the Seattle 33, Brunell threw a pass down the middle of the field. Safety Michael Boulware and receiver Santana Moss both went up for the ball at exactly the same time. Boulware was a little behind and to the side of Moss, but reached his hands through Moss' hands, and knocked the ball away. Penalty flag. Boulware and the Seahawks could not believe the call. Even some of the other refs seemed to be trying to talk the flag-thrower out of the call, as they huddled for several seconds before announcing it. But it was too late. Pass interference. 30+ yard penalty. First down. Redkins score a big touchdown a couple plays later.
Replays clearly showed it was an awful call. Not even "questionable", just awful. Even the announcers (who were clearly Skins fans.. I think I even heard one go "Yes!" under his breath when Brown missed the kick) admitted it was a bad call. Many Skins fans posting on message boards admitted it was a bad call (though there are always a handful of childish fans who won't admit anything that might take away from a win). On NFL Primetime, they actually showed the play (and a replay of it) as part of the brief highlights of the game, and said it was a bad call. The refs screw us. Again.
And apparently, Detroit got screwed even worse. A game-winning touchdown pass by Joey "Come On I Need A Win Before The Lions Fans Lynch Me" Harrington was reversed after instant replay review. It was called a touchdown on the field when the receiver seemingly dragged his knee in bounds in the end zone while catching the ball. Apparently the replay confirmed the call on the field. But, somehow, some way, the referee saw it otherwise. He said the receiver did not have possession in bounds. Call reversed, Lions lose.
I expect the NFL to issue an apology or two today for the bad calls yesterday. But an apology does not turn that loss into a win.
Still, despite the refs sucking, we still had a chance to win that game. But a fucking kicker lost it.
Friday, September 30, 2005
Week 4 Picks
And here we go again! Stats so far:
Last Week -
Samichlaus: 8-6
St. Ides: 7-7
Season -
Samichlaus: 23-23
St. Ides: 18-28
Due to circumstances totally under my control, my analysis will be quick and dirty this week. And let me say a special hello to my wife Karen who was very upset that I didn’t mention her once in last weeks picks…
Buffalo +0.5 over NEW ORLEANS
First "home" game for the Saints in San Antonio. Buffalo QB J.P. Losman has gotten worse each week instead of better. I just think the Bills defense is solid enough to give Aaron Brooks and company some trouble. I really want to take the Saints and say they'll play inspired football. I really do. But I just can't pull the trigger. Bills 24, Saints 20.
I want to believe. I saw this commercial with all the New York Giants wearing Saints uniforms and it really was touching. However, this is reality.
Bills 20, Saints 17
JAGUARS -3.5 over Denver
Denver looked like world beaters on Monday night against the Chiefs, making everybody second guess their declarations that the KC defense is much better this year and they're a real contender. But they were in Denver. The Jacksonville D shut down the high-powered Seattle and Indy offense, but then barely beat the horrible Jets. In Jacksonville, Jake Plummer returns to his usual self, and it's not even close. Jaguars 24, Broncos 10.
To quote Mike the bartender from the Stadium Sports Bar in Long Island City (regarding the Broncos) “They suck on the road”
Jaguars 24 Broncos 13
BUCS -7.5 over Lions
Joey Harrington, meet the Tampa Bay defense. The only thing going for the Lions in this game is that they won't have to worry about their home crowd booing the hell out of them. Bucs 24, Lions 10.
Yep. We agree again. This week is getting boring!
Bucs 27 Lions 15
BENGALS -9.5 over Texans
The Bengals are riding high, and have a pretty easy schedule the next few games. Most "experts" are picking them to be the last remaining unbeaten team. I won't go that far, but I do think their defense (5 INTS two weeks in a row) is catching up to their offense and they beat the poop out of the hapless Texans. Bengals 31, Texans 17.
Boomer Esiason called Carson Palmer the best young quarterback in the game, not David Carr.
Bengals 31 Texans 13
TITANS +7.5 over Colts
Peyton Manning is killing me. I took him with the #3 pick in the one fantasy league I'm in with an actual prize on the line, and he's killing me. Throw some frickin TDs, Peyton!!! All the talk is about how good the Colts D is now and how they can simply win games by pounding the ball with Edge James. Well, if the Colts are content to win games by 3-6 points by pounding the ball and playing defense, then I'm going to stop taking them. Last week, they were inside the Browns 20 with like 4 minutes to go leading by 7. They were giving 13. Touchdown, and they cover. Last year, Manning would have done a play action on 2nd and 1, and thrown an easy TD pass. This year, they ran and ran and ran, all the way down to the 5 yard line.... By then the clock was almost dead and the Browns were out of timeouts. A couple kneel downs, and game over. They didn't cover. Colts 24, Titans 18.
Damn, another complete agreement. I’m going to keep betting against the Colts until they prove me wrong.
Colts 20 Titties 17
CHIEFS -2.5 over Eagles
The Chiefs are back home after an embarassing loss in Denver, with Vermeil whining about Champ Bailey's "micced up" comments and the defense licking its wounds. McNabb is battered, but has played well. I think the home field is enough for the Chiefs to win this one, just barely. Chiefs 24, Eagles 20.
Finally. I took the Eagles in this game solely on the basis of last weeks games. That may be poor thinking but I’m going with it.
Eagles 31 Chiefs 24
Chargers +5.5 over PATS
More injuries for the Patriots - Rodney Harrison, some offensive lineman, and Kevin Faulk, all out. Meanwhile, the Chargers figured out all they have to do is give Tomlinson the ball. I think the Pats still win this, but not by more than a field goal. Patriots 26, Chargers 23.
I like San Diego in this game as well, but I’m wavering. The Pats lost Rodney Harrison this week and that’s huge. Although this makes life easier for Drew Brees, the Pats always seem to find a way to play good D no matter who they wheel out there. I’m sticking with my gut instinct, Patsies win but don’t cover…
Patriots 23 Chargers 20
Seahawks +2.5 over REDSKINS
I'm not going to ruin our mojo by going against Seattle this week. Yes, the Skins have a good defense. But their offense is pretty brutal. They're 2-0, but are about 5 plays from 0-2. As good as the Skins defense is, I still like our chances running the ball to the left behind Jones and Hutchinson. Oh, and ex-Seahawk Sean Springs will have something to prove. The bastard has been great since leaving Seattle, where injuries and a bad attitude had him playing as an ineffective nickel back when he left. Really though, I don't see the Washington offense getting much going, and the Seattle defense wins this one. Seahawks 17, Redskins 13.
Seattle is the most underrated team in the NFL. They win on the road…
Seahawks 24 Redskins 13
Rams +3.5 over GIANTS
The Rams suck on the road. Still, their offense usually manages to pull out a win or two every year that they should lose, despite Martz best efforts. The Giants shoud win this easily. Eli played well in the blowout against the Chargers, in a hostile environment. It was the defense that fell apart, and it's even worse off now with starting CB Will Peterson out. Rams 30, Giants 27.
I’m taking the Rams to win and cover. I think the loss of Peterson will be bigger to the G-men than the loss of Harrison to the Patroits.
Rams 34 Giants 20
Jets +7.5 over RAVENS
Everybody is writing off the Jets, and rightly so with some Bollinger guy at QB now, and the ageless Vinny Testeverde the backup. But the Ravens offense hasn't been all that great, even WITH all their starters. More than a touchdown is way too much to give in this one. Ravens win, but don't cover. Ravens 16, Jets 10.
Brooks Bollinger is better than everyone thinks. But the sight of Ray Lewis knifing through the line will be too much for the former Badger to handle.
Ravens 23 Jets 10
RAIDERS -3.5 over Cowboys
One of these days, Moss and Collins will have a huge game. Who better than against a Cowboys team that gave up those huge plays to blow the game against Washington? It also took Dallas a huge 4th quarter comeback to beat the awful Niners last week. Raiders 31, Cowboys 24.
Maybe there’s a part of me living in 1986 when Bill Parcels was a good coach. Don’t ask. I’m taking the ‘boys to win.
Cowboys 27 Raiders 20
FALCONS -6.5 over Vikings
Will the real Daunte Culpepper please stand up? Atlanta has a good enough defense to make Culpepper revert to his Weeks 1 and 2 interception throwing machine. Over/under is 3.5 on picks by Daunte. Falcons 30, Vikings 17.
Falcons at home and looking good. Vick’s still dinged and that forces him to actually act like a quarterback.
Vicks Herpes Infested Penis 34 – Vikings 17
Niners +2.5 over CARDINALS (in Mexico)
Oh, a real Sunday night treat! Two god awful teams playing in Mexico! Let's see if any of the Mexicans are clever enough to get on TV with a sign saying something like "El NFL en ESPaNol!" The only thing that would make this game interesting to watch would be if we get some fecal snow. Niners 34, Cardinals 27.
Fecal Snow????? What the hell is that?
Cardinals 20 - El Niner-0’s 13
Packers +8.5 over PANTHERS
I'll leave the in-depth analysis on this one to Samichlaus, but if the Packers don't at least cover in this game, it really might be time to start thinking about the draft. Too bad they took that QB this year, cause they might have a legit shot at Leinart. Panthers 24, Packers 20.
Rogers will be a better QB than Lienart, trust me. The Packers have lost their last two games by one and two points respectively. From all reports I’ve read they’ve practiced very well this week. I think they cover, and hope they win, but I can’t lie to our loyal readers any more.
Panthers 24 – Packers 21
Last Week -
Samichlaus: 8-6
St. Ides: 7-7
Season -
Samichlaus: 23-23
St. Ides: 18-28
Due to circumstances totally under my control, my analysis will be quick and dirty this week. And let me say a special hello to my wife Karen who was very upset that I didn’t mention her once in last weeks picks…
Buffalo +0.5 over NEW ORLEANS
First "home" game for the Saints in San Antonio. Buffalo QB J.P. Losman has gotten worse each week instead of better. I just think the Bills defense is solid enough to give Aaron Brooks and company some trouble. I really want to take the Saints and say they'll play inspired football. I really do. But I just can't pull the trigger. Bills 24, Saints 20.
I want to believe. I saw this commercial with all the New York Giants wearing Saints uniforms and it really was touching. However, this is reality.
Bills 20, Saints 17
JAGUARS -3.5 over Denver
Denver looked like world beaters on Monday night against the Chiefs, making everybody second guess their declarations that the KC defense is much better this year and they're a real contender. But they were in Denver. The Jacksonville D shut down the high-powered Seattle and Indy offense, but then barely beat the horrible Jets. In Jacksonville, Jake Plummer returns to his usual self, and it's not even close. Jaguars 24, Broncos 10.
To quote Mike the bartender from the Stadium Sports Bar in Long Island City (regarding the Broncos) “They suck on the road”
Jaguars 24 Broncos 13
BUCS -7.5 over Lions
Joey Harrington, meet the Tampa Bay defense. The only thing going for the Lions in this game is that they won't have to worry about their home crowd booing the hell out of them. Bucs 24, Lions 10.
Yep. We agree again. This week is getting boring!
Bucs 27 Lions 15
BENGALS -9.5 over Texans
The Bengals are riding high, and have a pretty easy schedule the next few games. Most "experts" are picking them to be the last remaining unbeaten team. I won't go that far, but I do think their defense (5 INTS two weeks in a row) is catching up to their offense and they beat the poop out of the hapless Texans. Bengals 31, Texans 17.
Boomer Esiason called Carson Palmer the best young quarterback in the game, not David Carr.
Bengals 31 Texans 13
TITANS +7.5 over Colts
Peyton Manning is killing me. I took him with the #3 pick in the one fantasy league I'm in with an actual prize on the line, and he's killing me. Throw some frickin TDs, Peyton!!! All the talk is about how good the Colts D is now and how they can simply win games by pounding the ball with Edge James. Well, if the Colts are content to win games by 3-6 points by pounding the ball and playing defense, then I'm going to stop taking them. Last week, they were inside the Browns 20 with like 4 minutes to go leading by 7. They were giving 13. Touchdown, and they cover. Last year, Manning would have done a play action on 2nd and 1, and thrown an easy TD pass. This year, they ran and ran and ran, all the way down to the 5 yard line.... By then the clock was almost dead and the Browns were out of timeouts. A couple kneel downs, and game over. They didn't cover. Colts 24, Titans 18.
Damn, another complete agreement. I’m going to keep betting against the Colts until they prove me wrong.
Colts 20 Titties 17
CHIEFS -2.5 over Eagles
The Chiefs are back home after an embarassing loss in Denver, with Vermeil whining about Champ Bailey's "micced up" comments and the defense licking its wounds. McNabb is battered, but has played well. I think the home field is enough for the Chiefs to win this one, just barely. Chiefs 24, Eagles 20.
Finally. I took the Eagles in this game solely on the basis of last weeks games. That may be poor thinking but I’m going with it.
Eagles 31 Chiefs 24
Chargers +5.5 over PATS
More injuries for the Patriots - Rodney Harrison, some offensive lineman, and Kevin Faulk, all out. Meanwhile, the Chargers figured out all they have to do is give Tomlinson the ball. I think the Pats still win this, but not by more than a field goal. Patriots 26, Chargers 23.
I like San Diego in this game as well, but I’m wavering. The Pats lost Rodney Harrison this week and that’s huge. Although this makes life easier for Drew Brees, the Pats always seem to find a way to play good D no matter who they wheel out there. I’m sticking with my gut instinct, Patsies win but don’t cover…
Patriots 23 Chargers 20
Seahawks +2.5 over REDSKINS
I'm not going to ruin our mojo by going against Seattle this week. Yes, the Skins have a good defense. But their offense is pretty brutal. They're 2-0, but are about 5 plays from 0-2. As good as the Skins defense is, I still like our chances running the ball to the left behind Jones and Hutchinson. Oh, and ex-Seahawk Sean Springs will have something to prove. The bastard has been great since leaving Seattle, where injuries and a bad attitude had him playing as an ineffective nickel back when he left. Really though, I don't see the Washington offense getting much going, and the Seattle defense wins this one. Seahawks 17, Redskins 13.
Seattle is the most underrated team in the NFL. They win on the road…
Seahawks 24 Redskins 13
Rams +3.5 over GIANTS
The Rams suck on the road. Still, their offense usually manages to pull out a win or two every year that they should lose, despite Martz best efforts. The Giants shoud win this easily. Eli played well in the blowout against the Chargers, in a hostile environment. It was the defense that fell apart, and it's even worse off now with starting CB Will Peterson out. Rams 30, Giants 27.
I’m taking the Rams to win and cover. I think the loss of Peterson will be bigger to the G-men than the loss of Harrison to the Patroits.
Rams 34 Giants 20
Jets +7.5 over RAVENS
Everybody is writing off the Jets, and rightly so with some Bollinger guy at QB now, and the ageless Vinny Testeverde the backup. But the Ravens offense hasn't been all that great, even WITH all their starters. More than a touchdown is way too much to give in this one. Ravens win, but don't cover. Ravens 16, Jets 10.
Brooks Bollinger is better than everyone thinks. But the sight of Ray Lewis knifing through the line will be too much for the former Badger to handle.
Ravens 23 Jets 10
RAIDERS -3.5 over Cowboys
One of these days, Moss and Collins will have a huge game. Who better than against a Cowboys team that gave up those huge plays to blow the game against Washington? It also took Dallas a huge 4th quarter comeback to beat the awful Niners last week. Raiders 31, Cowboys 24.
Maybe there’s a part of me living in 1986 when Bill Parcels was a good coach. Don’t ask. I’m taking the ‘boys to win.
Cowboys 27 Raiders 20
FALCONS -6.5 over Vikings
Will the real Daunte Culpepper please stand up? Atlanta has a good enough defense to make Culpepper revert to his Weeks 1 and 2 interception throwing machine. Over/under is 3.5 on picks by Daunte. Falcons 30, Vikings 17.
Falcons at home and looking good. Vick’s still dinged and that forces him to actually act like a quarterback.
Vicks Herpes Infested Penis 34 – Vikings 17
Niners +2.5 over CARDINALS (in Mexico)
Oh, a real Sunday night treat! Two god awful teams playing in Mexico! Let's see if any of the Mexicans are clever enough to get on TV with a sign saying something like "El NFL en ESPaNol!" The only thing that would make this game interesting to watch would be if we get some fecal snow. Niners 34, Cardinals 27.
Fecal Snow????? What the hell is that?
Cardinals 20 - El Niner-0’s 13
Packers +8.5 over PANTHERS
I'll leave the in-depth analysis on this one to Samichlaus, but if the Packers don't at least cover in this game, it really might be time to start thinking about the draft. Too bad they took that QB this year, cause they might have a legit shot at Leinart. Panthers 24, Packers 20.
Rogers will be a better QB than Lienart, trust me. The Packers have lost their last two games by one and two points respectively. From all reports I’ve read they’ve practiced very well this week. I think they cover, and hope they win, but I can’t lie to our loyal readers any more.
Panthers 24 – Packers 21
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
How Does This Guy Keep His Job?
More proof Dr. Z is an idiot.
Seahawks, ranked #9 this week in his Power Rankings:
Seattle Seahawks (2-1)For the first two games, they were blanked in the second half. Against the Cardinals, they got off the schneid. Mike Holmgren's comment in his postgame press conference was, "I told you we'd score in the second half, and I was right, wasn't I?" This note came from our correspondent's file, and there's no indication of the tenor of his remark, but I hope Mike was being sarcastic. If he was serious, then he, the Hawks, and his friends are in big trouble.
Really, this guy should be dragged out and beaten. Following the Falcons game, someone in the press pointed out that Seattle hadn't scored in the second half. Holmgren made a tongue in cheek comment, guaranteeing that they would score a touchdown in the second half sometime this season. He guaranteed it. After the Cardinals game, he made this comment, jokingly, reminding everybody of his broad "sometime this season" prediction.
First of all, A) it shows he knows NOTHING of Holmgren's personality and how he relates to the media in these press conferences. B) all it takes is reading a few press conference transcripts from head coaches during the week to be aware of this situation, and C) not only was this in his press conferences, but ESPN and I think maybe even NFL.com mentioned the remark in their "Game Previews" during last week. So not only was this not buried deep in long transcripts, but competitor websites had somehow realized it. Oh, and D) if he was being serious, why, exactly, would that put our team in trouble? What a frickin moron.
I mean, if this was my full-time job, I would be reading/watching EVERY head coach press conference, especially teams I'm going to rank in my top 10. What it SHOULD say for Seattle is something like this:
"The Seahawks did what they should do if they want to win the division - handily beat a mediocre team at home. With the well-balanced offense clicking, the receivers' dropping woes seemingly a thing of the past, and an improving young defense, it will be interesting to see how they handle the upcoming two big road games at Washington and St. Louis."
Seahawks, ranked #9 this week in his Power Rankings:
Seattle Seahawks (2-1)For the first two games, they were blanked in the second half. Against the Cardinals, they got off the schneid. Mike Holmgren's comment in his postgame press conference was, "I told you we'd score in the second half, and I was right, wasn't I?" This note came from our correspondent's file, and there's no indication of the tenor of his remark, but I hope Mike was being sarcastic. If he was serious, then he, the Hawks, and his friends are in big trouble.
Really, this guy should be dragged out and beaten. Following the Falcons game, someone in the press pointed out that Seattle hadn't scored in the second half. Holmgren made a tongue in cheek comment, guaranteeing that they would score a touchdown in the second half sometime this season. He guaranteed it. After the Cardinals game, he made this comment, jokingly, reminding everybody of his broad "sometime this season" prediction.
First of all, A) it shows he knows NOTHING of Holmgren's personality and how he relates to the media in these press conferences. B) all it takes is reading a few press conference transcripts from head coaches during the week to be aware of this situation, and C) not only was this in his press conferences, but ESPN and I think maybe even NFL.com mentioned the remark in their "Game Previews" during last week. So not only was this not buried deep in long transcripts, but competitor websites had somehow realized it. Oh, and D) if he was being serious, why, exactly, would that put our team in trouble? What a frickin moron.
I mean, if this was my full-time job, I would be reading/watching EVERY head coach press conference, especially teams I'm going to rank in my top 10. What it SHOULD say for Seattle is something like this:
"The Seahawks did what they should do if they want to win the division - handily beat a mediocre team at home. With the well-balanced offense clicking, the receivers' dropping woes seemingly a thing of the past, and an improving young defense, it will be interesting to see how they handle the upcoming two big road games at Washington and St. Louis."
The Five Stages of Football Death
Last year right around this time of the season the Packers were at 1 - 3 heading into a Monday Night Game against the Tennessee Titans. It was a game they would eventually lose 48 - 27 pushing them to a 1 - 4 record. Their defense had been abominable, and many (including Ol' Samichlaus) had pretty much written off the season. It was in that spirit that I wrote the following missive. Normally I am not such an egotist as to post retread material but this piece seems as relevant now as it did then. After all, the Packers are headed into a Monday night showdown with another Southern team, and are equally if not more desperate than last season. So without further adieu, I present "The Five Stages of Football Death"
I know, I know “It ain't over till it’s over ” or at least until Mike Sherman decides that yes, “I can’t handle the two jobs, so I’d like to introduce the new head coach of the Green Bay Packers, Bob Slowik” . But last night, something happened that got me thinking, something profound and awful at the same time. Last night while conversing with my father in law, who is a huge Dolphins fan, I found myself having the dreaded "High draft pick" conversation. I can’t tell you how it started, or how I got there, but it actually felt good. There I was talking about “drafting a stud D-lineman” while listening to Dad go on about “a new Quarterback”. I felt a sense of calm that I had not felt since, well, week one Tuesday morning.
I had no idea how quickly stage five can sneak up on someone. You do know what I’m talking about, right? Stage 5? Of course, I’m referring to Elizabeth Kubler - Ross's lesser know work "5 Stages of Football death". What really amazed me was how after careful analysis I realized how I have experienced each and every stage. Maybe some of you have too. Maybe you haven’t quite understood what you’ve been going through, so I offer this up in this public forum not only as public service to all Packer fans, but as an apology to my beautiful wife Karen who by solemn vow has sworn to stay with me through good times and bad. Honey, for my recent lack of enthusiasm, morose attitude and overall not nice-ness, I apologize and hope that this forum will put into intellectual terms that your brilliant mind can understand the severity of the recent trauma I have gone through….
The Five Stages of Football Death
1: (Week 2) Denial and Isolation: "This is not happening to the Packers. That Bears game was an anomaly. You saw them against the Cats. Hey, a few plays here and there, and it's a different game. Lovie had ‘em fired up. The coaches will pull them together, you’ll see. Slowik’s a genius. They're going to shock the world against the Colts"
2: (Week 3) Anger: “*#($(#))$%ing defense. What the *&#^ is Slowik thinking? *(#&$ing blitz blitz blitz against Manning? How &*%#$)*&^@ing open did we leave their receivers? Manning ain’t all that. Filthy overpaid *$#)*&^%ers. How much am I paying for DirecTV? I wait all week for this game and these *$&^@%)!&$ers don't bother to show. Do they expect Favre to carry the weight of this &@^#ing team in his @*$$&#( @&$$sack? Karen? Karen honey? Sweetie, where are you going???" <<>>
3: (Week 4) Bargaining: "OK, we got the Giants at home next week. The Giants haven’t won here since 1971! If we can just beat them we get to 2 - 2 and maybe we can put a streak together.." (Later that week) "OK, Favre's hurt, but he just threw a TD pass!!! Yes!!!! If he can only get back into the game, we'll have a shot! Please God, let Favre get back in!! Remember that fire truck you never got me when I was six? Here’s your big chance!!! ... look, I'll pray, OK? Our Favre who art in Lambeau, hallowed be thy arm...."
4: (Week 5) Depression: "Man, I'm depressed. Even the adult sites haven't helped. I could use a drink, but I'm too sick. Besides every where I go the sports bars remind me of my beloved Packers (fights back tears) Maybe I’ll get some Nyquil, just like when I was 15. Why did I spend the $40.00 on Packer Plus Premium? Hmm… Cliff Christl is a funny looking guy…”
5: (Last night) Acceptance: "So Dad, you think the Fins take that QB everyone’s talking about? ....no, I don't know if he Jewish, what difference does that make?.... well, I guess I never really though about it, yeah Dartmouth is an Ivy League school.….. I guess since the Packers will probably have a top 5 I think they should go D lineman or best D player available..... Sunday? No they're playing Monday Night.... Nahh, probably not. The Botanical Gardens are open late for the fall zinnia festival and I thought I'd take Karen there just before kickoff"
I know, I know “It ain't over till it’s over ” or at least until Mike Sherman decides that yes, “I can’t handle the two jobs, so I’d like to introduce the new head coach of the Green Bay Packers, Bob Slowik” . But last night, something happened that got me thinking, something profound and awful at the same time. Last night while conversing with my father in law, who is a huge Dolphins fan, I found myself having the dreaded "High draft pick" conversation. I can’t tell you how it started, or how I got there, but it actually felt good. There I was talking about “drafting a stud D-lineman” while listening to Dad go on about “a new Quarterback”. I felt a sense of calm that I had not felt since, well, week one Tuesday morning.
I had no idea how quickly stage five can sneak up on someone. You do know what I’m talking about, right? Stage 5? Of course, I’m referring to Elizabeth Kubler - Ross's lesser know work "5 Stages of Football death". What really amazed me was how after careful analysis I realized how I have experienced each and every stage. Maybe some of you have too. Maybe you haven’t quite understood what you’ve been going through, so I offer this up in this public forum not only as public service to all Packer fans, but as an apology to my beautiful wife Karen who by solemn vow has sworn to stay with me through good times and bad. Honey, for my recent lack of enthusiasm, morose attitude and overall not nice-ness, I apologize and hope that this forum will put into intellectual terms that your brilliant mind can understand the severity of the recent trauma I have gone through….
The Five Stages of Football Death
1: (Week 2) Denial and Isolation: "This is not happening to the Packers. That Bears game was an anomaly. You saw them against the Cats. Hey, a few plays here and there, and it's a different game. Lovie had ‘em fired up. The coaches will pull them together, you’ll see. Slowik’s a genius. They're going to shock the world against the Colts"
2: (Week 3) Anger: “*#($(#))$%ing defense. What the *&#^ is Slowik thinking? *(#&$ing blitz blitz blitz against Manning? How &*%#$)*&^@ing open did we leave their receivers? Manning ain’t all that. Filthy overpaid *$#)*&^%ers. How much am I paying for DirecTV? I wait all week for this game and these *$&^@%)!&$ers don't bother to show. Do they expect Favre to carry the weight of this &@^#ing team in his @*$$&#( @&$$sack? Karen? Karen honey? Sweetie, where are you going???" <<
3: (Week 4) Bargaining: "OK, we got the Giants at home next week. The Giants haven’t won here since 1971! If we can just beat them we get to 2 - 2 and maybe we can put a streak together.." (Later that week) "OK, Favre's hurt, but he just threw a TD pass!!! Yes!!!! If he can only get back into the game, we'll have a shot! Please God, let Favre get back in!! Remember that fire truck you never got me when I was six? Here’s your big chance!!! ... look, I'll pray, OK? Our Favre who art in Lambeau, hallowed be thy arm...."
4: (Week 5) Depression: "Man, I'm depressed. Even the adult sites haven't helped. I could use a drink, but I'm too sick. Besides every where I go the sports bars remind me of my beloved Packers (fights back tears) Maybe I’ll get some Nyquil, just like when I was 15. Why did I spend the $40.00 on Packer Plus Premium? Hmm… Cliff Christl is a funny looking guy…”
5: (Last night) Acceptance: "So Dad, you think the Fins take that QB everyone’s talking about? ....no, I don't know if he Jewish, what difference does that make?.... well, I guess I never really though about it, yeah Dartmouth is an Ivy League school.….. I guess since the Packers will probably have a top 5 I think they should go D lineman or best D player available..... Sunday? No they're playing Monday Night.... Nahh, probably not. The Botanical Gardens are open late for the fall zinnia festival and I thought I'd take Karen there just before kickoff"
Friday, September 23, 2005
Week 3 Picks
Wow, I sucked last week. But you know what, so did a lot of those "experts" and they're picking WITHOUT the spread. Peter King (aforementioned writer from SI who's pissing me off lately) admitted to going just 4-12 last week with no point spread involved. Straight up, he only picked 4 games correctly. That makes me feel a little better. What will make me feel a lot better is getting every game right this week.
Last week was a strange week for picking games. On one hand, I went 8-8 which was pretty good. Plus I’m kicking Donovan McNabb’s Mom’s fat ass. I’m in the 82nd percentile and moving up. I also correctly predicted the Pats loss, which NOBODY got right. On the other hand, the Bears, Jets, and (uggh) Cleveland shocked me.
Atlanta (+0.5) over BUFFALO
I guess the question is who was more exposed last week? Atlanta on the road against a decent defense, or rookie QB J.P. Losman against a good defense? Really, I'm tempted to take the Bills at home in this one, especially with Vick a bit gimpy. But I say the Atlanta defense steps up a notch and I think Mora is a good enough coach to get them to bounce back and win this one. Falcons 17, Bills 13.
I like Vick and his herpes infested penis in this game too. Ed Donatel is a smart enough defensive coordinator to sufficiently confuse J.P. Losman. Look for Atlanta to have several picks while winning easy. Atlanta wins 24 -13
Carolina (-3.5) over MIAMI
I'm not sure if we know more or less this week than we did last week. Carolina just beat the Patriots, but the Patriots were sloppy. Miami also played an ugly game, keeping it close with the Jets. I think the defenses are pretty much a wash here, but the Panthers offense ought to be good enough to cover. But just barely. Panthers 17, Dolphins 13.
I like the Cats too. The Cats are a good, well coached team. The Fins are well coached, but they’re not that good. Sure they kept it close against the Jets, but the Jets are terrible. The Patsies were ripe for the pickins. I look for the Cats to follow up with a big win and not a letdown. Panthers 31- Miami 17
CHICAGO (+3.5) over Cinci
Are the Bears the sleeper team of the year? Or has Carson Palmer finally come into his own and ready to be a Pro Bowl caliber QB? My dad usually preaches "Always take a home team getting points." Sometimes I listen, sometimes I don't. I think these teams are closely enough matched that I'll take the home team and the points. Bears 20, Bengals 17.
I’m going with the theory that the Bears game last week was an anomaly. Besides, and in case I haven’t mentioned it, Boomer Esiason thinks that Carson Palmer is the best young QB in the league. As they sing in Wisconsin : “The Bears still suck”. Bungles 20, em-Bear-asses 10
INDY (-13.5) over Cleveland
Manning really hasn't gone off yet. I think it's time. And maybe the Colts defense really is for real, who knows? Colts 31, Browns 17.
I’m not sure what went wrong for Indy last week, though they won and as St. Ides pointed out to me did not cover. I contend that Indianapolis is the best team in football right now, but I think 13.5 is a lot of points. Cleveland has a good D, so I’m taking the bait. Indy wins but does not cover for the second week in a row: Indy 24 -17
Jaguars (+0.5) over JETS
The Jets were fairly lucky to win an ugly game versus a pretty bad Miami team last week. While the Jaguars shut down the league's best offense. I made this one my "double" pick of the week. Pennington ought to be good for 2-3 picks this game. Jaguars 24, Jets 10.
I see it that way as well. The Jets truly surprised me last week by winning. No surprises here against a quality opponent: Jaguars 27 – Jets 13
Saints (+4.5) over VIKINGS
The heat is on the Vikings, and once Culpepper throws his first interception, the boo-birds will be out, and suddenly it won't be much of a home field advantage... Meanwhile, the Saints are coming off a tough "home" loss played in Giant stadium. I think they bounce back, and even if they don't quite win the game, it should be within a field goal. Saints 27, Vikings 24.
I think the Vikes show up at home and play their best game of the season. That team has so much goddamn talent it makes me sick. They would be dominating (singing here) “if they only had a brain”. The truth about the Saints is a sad truth: they’re not very good. The Vikings get their first win: 34- 20
PHILLY (-7.5) over Oakland
I'm going to say McNabb and Owens at home are a bit better than Whiskey Collins and Moss on the road. Plus Philly has a better defense by far. The countdown until the Moss mental breakdown begins this week as Collins can't hit the broad side of a barn. Eagles 31, Raiders 20.
This is a tough game to pick. The Eagles looked un-friggin-stoppable last week. Oakland has Randy Moss, and that’ll always keep a game close. Plus, Moss likes to show up for big games. I’m taking the Raiders and the points. Eagles 34 – Raiders 31
PACKERS (+3.5) over Tampa Bay
Green Bay has me worried. But I can't give them points at home, just can't do it. When was the last time Green Bay lost 2 in a row at home? As good as Tampa Bay has looked, I don't think they get that done. Packers 21, Bucs 17.
First, let me say that I can not remember the last time the Packers were a home dog. Second, let me say that the tone out of Green Bay is anything but urgent. Third, let me say that Tampa has a good team with the leagues number one ranked defense. Fourth, let me say that the Bucs head coach, Jon Gruden, was one of Favre’s Quarterback coaches under Mike Holmgren. With all that said, let me suggest that you pick the Bucs. I, however, am taking the Packers. Packers 24 – Bucs 23
Titans (+6.5) over RAMS
The Rams ought to win this game at home against a mediocre Titans team. Although the Titans are riding a high after shocking the Ravens last week. The Rams offense is a bit more explosive than the Titans, but a couple turnovers, a patented Martz bone-headed move or two, and a late Titans score in garbage time keeps them from covering. Rams 31, Titans 27.
The greatest show on turf comes home to roost this week. I’m looking for a big game out of the Rams offense, and a crap performance out of the Titans. I like the Rams big: Rams 38 – Titties 17
SEAHAWKS (-6.5) over Cardinals
If Seattle is for real, they win this game handily. In a reverse of last week's successful reverse psychology pick, I'm going to keep the faith and hope they batter Warner and co. Seahawks 31, Cardinals 20.
The battle of the birds. Sorry, I had to pause and look at that again. Yeah, here’s the Sami-scoop: Seattle is going to keep getting better as the year goes on. That’s a good young team with some studs on both sides of the ball. Arizona will prove to be another over-hyped pretender. I’m going with the Chicken Hawks: Seattle 27 – Arizona 13
NINERS (+6.5) over Dallas
That Monday night loss has got to be killing Parcells and his team right now. How do they bounce back after a short week to go to San Fran? Well, I think they probably win, but just barely. In two plays last week, Dallas went from people calling them a contender, to a bit of a joke. Maybe this is my anti-Parcells bias speaking, but whatever. Cowboys 17, Niners 13.
No way the Cowboys lose this game. The question is do they have the chops to cover? I’m going with a resounding yes and not so much because the Cowboys are so good, but more because the Niners are so damn bad. I never thought I’d see the day… Boys 27 – Niners 13
Pats (+3.5) over STEELERS
Can the Patriots bounce back after the dreadful loss last week? As our anonymous Pats fan pointed out, Brady did his best Bledsoe impersonation. And their defense does not look as good as in the past. I think the Steelers win this one, but 3 points is too much to be giving the defending champs. Steelers 19, Patriots 17.
Another tough game to forecast, but I’m picking the Pats. Here’s their opportunity to show Pittsburgh who’s boss. It’s going to be a low scoring snot bubbler, but the Patriots win it outright. Patsies 17 - Steelers 7
Giants (+6.5) over CHARGERS
The Giants have looked pretty good so far on both sides of the ball. They win this game, and suddenly they are 3-0 and that extra home game against the Saints looms large in the playoff picture. I don't think they win this game against an 0-2 Chargers team that are two plays away from being 2-0, but I do think they keep it close. Chargers 29, Giants 24.
This is a case of the bookies know something that Samichlaus doesn’t. The Bolts are giving a TD to the Giants? That seems excessive. Don’t be surprised if the Giants win this game outright. For posterities sake I’ll go Bolts 24 – Giants 21.
Chiefs (+3.5) over BRONCOS
I like the Chiefs a lot this year (peek back at my AFC preview). Now seeing them in action, their defense looks for real, Larry Johnson has looked awesome paired with Priest Holmes, and they're 2-0. Another tough road game after winning in Oakland last week, but I think Denver is on a downward slide, and the Chiefs take a nice 3-0 division lead with this win. Even if the Broncos do pull it out, it will take another last second field goal, and they won't cover. Chiefs 30, Broncos 24.
I have got to pee so bad, it’s insane. This is the last pick and I’m struggling to get it done so I can get the mail off to St. Ides and then make a mad sprint to the toilet. I might even be coerced to drop a deuce. Chiefs 31 – Broncos 24
Last Week
Samichlaus: 8-8
St. Ides: 4-12
Overall:
Samichlaus: 15 -17
St. Ides: 11-21
Last week was a strange week for picking games. On one hand, I went 8-8 which was pretty good. Plus I’m kicking Donovan McNabb’s Mom’s fat ass. I’m in the 82nd percentile and moving up. I also correctly predicted the Pats loss, which NOBODY got right. On the other hand, the Bears, Jets, and (uggh) Cleveland shocked me.
Atlanta (+0.5) over BUFFALO
I guess the question is who was more exposed last week? Atlanta on the road against a decent defense, or rookie QB J.P. Losman against a good defense? Really, I'm tempted to take the Bills at home in this one, especially with Vick a bit gimpy. But I say the Atlanta defense steps up a notch and I think Mora is a good enough coach to get them to bounce back and win this one. Falcons 17, Bills 13.
I like Vick and his herpes infested penis in this game too. Ed Donatel is a smart enough defensive coordinator to sufficiently confuse J.P. Losman. Look for Atlanta to have several picks while winning easy. Atlanta wins 24 -13
Carolina (-3.5) over MIAMI
I'm not sure if we know more or less this week than we did last week. Carolina just beat the Patriots, but the Patriots were sloppy. Miami also played an ugly game, keeping it close with the Jets. I think the defenses are pretty much a wash here, but the Panthers offense ought to be good enough to cover. But just barely. Panthers 17, Dolphins 13.
I like the Cats too. The Cats are a good, well coached team. The Fins are well coached, but they’re not that good. Sure they kept it close against the Jets, but the Jets are terrible. The Patsies were ripe for the pickins. I look for the Cats to follow up with a big win and not a letdown. Panthers 31- Miami 17
CHICAGO (+3.5) over Cinci
Are the Bears the sleeper team of the year? Or has Carson Palmer finally come into his own and ready to be a Pro Bowl caliber QB? My dad usually preaches "Always take a home team getting points." Sometimes I listen, sometimes I don't. I think these teams are closely enough matched that I'll take the home team and the points. Bears 20, Bengals 17.
I’m going with the theory that the Bears game last week was an anomaly. Besides, and in case I haven’t mentioned it, Boomer Esiason thinks that Carson Palmer is the best young QB in the league. As they sing in Wisconsin : “The Bears still suck”. Bungles 20, em-Bear-asses 10
INDY (-13.5) over Cleveland
Manning really hasn't gone off yet. I think it's time. And maybe the Colts defense really is for real, who knows? Colts 31, Browns 17.
I’m not sure what went wrong for Indy last week, though they won and as St. Ides pointed out to me did not cover. I contend that Indianapolis is the best team in football right now, but I think 13.5 is a lot of points. Cleveland has a good D, so I’m taking the bait. Indy wins but does not cover for the second week in a row: Indy 24 -17
Jaguars (+0.5) over JETS
The Jets were fairly lucky to win an ugly game versus a pretty bad Miami team last week. While the Jaguars shut down the league's best offense. I made this one my "double" pick of the week. Pennington ought to be good for 2-3 picks this game. Jaguars 24, Jets 10.
I see it that way as well. The Jets truly surprised me last week by winning. No surprises here against a quality opponent: Jaguars 27 – Jets 13
Saints (+4.5) over VIKINGS
The heat is on the Vikings, and once Culpepper throws his first interception, the boo-birds will be out, and suddenly it won't be much of a home field advantage... Meanwhile, the Saints are coming off a tough "home" loss played in Giant stadium. I think they bounce back, and even if they don't quite win the game, it should be within a field goal. Saints 27, Vikings 24.
I think the Vikes show up at home and play their best game of the season. That team has so much goddamn talent it makes me sick. They would be dominating (singing here) “if they only had a brain”. The truth about the Saints is a sad truth: they’re not very good. The Vikings get their first win: 34- 20
PHILLY (-7.5) over Oakland
I'm going to say McNabb and Owens at home are a bit better than Whiskey Collins and Moss on the road. Plus Philly has a better defense by far. The countdown until the Moss mental breakdown begins this week as Collins can't hit the broad side of a barn. Eagles 31, Raiders 20.
This is a tough game to pick. The Eagles looked un-friggin-stoppable last week. Oakland has Randy Moss, and that’ll always keep a game close. Plus, Moss likes to show up for big games. I’m taking the Raiders and the points. Eagles 34 – Raiders 31
PACKERS (+3.5) over Tampa Bay
Green Bay has me worried. But I can't give them points at home, just can't do it. When was the last time Green Bay lost 2 in a row at home? As good as Tampa Bay has looked, I don't think they get that done. Packers 21, Bucs 17.
First, let me say that I can not remember the last time the Packers were a home dog. Second, let me say that the tone out of Green Bay is anything but urgent. Third, let me say that Tampa has a good team with the leagues number one ranked defense. Fourth, let me say that the Bucs head coach, Jon Gruden, was one of Favre’s Quarterback coaches under Mike Holmgren. With all that said, let me suggest that you pick the Bucs. I, however, am taking the Packers. Packers 24 – Bucs 23
Titans (+6.5) over RAMS
The Rams ought to win this game at home against a mediocre Titans team. Although the Titans are riding a high after shocking the Ravens last week. The Rams offense is a bit more explosive than the Titans, but a couple turnovers, a patented Martz bone-headed move or two, and a late Titans score in garbage time keeps them from covering. Rams 31, Titans 27.
The greatest show on turf comes home to roost this week. I’m looking for a big game out of the Rams offense, and a crap performance out of the Titans. I like the Rams big: Rams 38 – Titties 17
SEAHAWKS (-6.5) over Cardinals
If Seattle is for real, they win this game handily. In a reverse of last week's successful reverse psychology pick, I'm going to keep the faith and hope they batter Warner and co. Seahawks 31, Cardinals 20.
The battle of the birds. Sorry, I had to pause and look at that again. Yeah, here’s the Sami-scoop: Seattle is going to keep getting better as the year goes on. That’s a good young team with some studs on both sides of the ball. Arizona will prove to be another over-hyped pretender. I’m going with the Chicken Hawks: Seattle 27 – Arizona 13
NINERS (+6.5) over Dallas
That Monday night loss has got to be killing Parcells and his team right now. How do they bounce back after a short week to go to San Fran? Well, I think they probably win, but just barely. In two plays last week, Dallas went from people calling them a contender, to a bit of a joke. Maybe this is my anti-Parcells bias speaking, but whatever. Cowboys 17, Niners 13.
No way the Cowboys lose this game. The question is do they have the chops to cover? I’m going with a resounding yes and not so much because the Cowboys are so good, but more because the Niners are so damn bad. I never thought I’d see the day… Boys 27 – Niners 13
Pats (+3.5) over STEELERS
Can the Patriots bounce back after the dreadful loss last week? As our anonymous Pats fan pointed out, Brady did his best Bledsoe impersonation. And their defense does not look as good as in the past. I think the Steelers win this one, but 3 points is too much to be giving the defending champs. Steelers 19, Patriots 17.
Another tough game to forecast, but I’m picking the Pats. Here’s their opportunity to show Pittsburgh who’s boss. It’s going to be a low scoring snot bubbler, but the Patriots win it outright. Patsies 17 - Steelers 7
Giants (+6.5) over CHARGERS
The Giants have looked pretty good so far on both sides of the ball. They win this game, and suddenly they are 3-0 and that extra home game against the Saints looms large in the playoff picture. I don't think they win this game against an 0-2 Chargers team that are two plays away from being 2-0, but I do think they keep it close. Chargers 29, Giants 24.
This is a case of the bookies know something that Samichlaus doesn’t. The Bolts are giving a TD to the Giants? That seems excessive. Don’t be surprised if the Giants win this game outright. For posterities sake I’ll go Bolts 24 – Giants 21.
Chiefs (+3.5) over BRONCOS
I like the Chiefs a lot this year (peek back at my AFC preview). Now seeing them in action, their defense looks for real, Larry Johnson has looked awesome paired with Priest Holmes, and they're 2-0. Another tough road game after winning in Oakland last week, but I think Denver is on a downward slide, and the Chiefs take a nice 3-0 division lead with this win. Even if the Broncos do pull it out, it will take another last second field goal, and they won't cover. Chiefs 30, Broncos 24.
I have got to pee so bad, it’s insane. This is the last pick and I’m struggling to get it done so I can get the mail off to St. Ides and then make a mad sprint to the toilet. I might even be coerced to drop a deuce. Chiefs 31 – Broncos 24
Last Week
Samichlaus: 8-8
St. Ides: 4-12
Overall:
Samichlaus: 15 -17
St. Ides: 11-21
Thursday, September 22, 2005
Death to the Experts
I used to like reading the SI writers, but more and more, I find myself thinking "Uhmmm, are they effin kidding me?"
I mean, I guess these guys don't watch every single game every single week (although I would if that was my full-time job). But they should at least investigate a bit more before making such blanket statements like this one...
In this week's SI Power Rankings, Dr. Z ranked the Seahawks at #12, and had this to say:
"They almost did it again, that fourth quarter fade. If Michael Vick had stayed in, who knows?"
If Vick had stayed in?!?! Vick missed all of 5 snaps the entire game. One of which was a 2-point conversion try. Backup Matt Schaub (who many of the same experts claim could be a starter in several teams in the league) came in for Vick. Here's the recap of those snaps Vick missed:
1.) 2nd and 5 at SEA 5 (4:41) #8 Schaub in at QB W.Dunn up the middle to SEA 5 for no gain (K.Hamlin, J.Sharper).
2.) 3rd and 5 at SEA 5 (4:06) M.Schaub pass incomplete to B.Finneran.
PENALTY on SEA-A.Dyson, Defensive Pass Interference, 4 yards, enforced at SEA 5 - No Play.
3.) 1st and 1 at SEA 1 (4:01) T.Duckett right guard for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN.
4.) TWO-POINT CONVERSION ATTEMPT. M.Schaub pass to A.Crumpler is complete. ATTEMPT SUCCEEDS.
(NOTE: Vick was back in for the final drive, and only left again on 4th and long, after he took a bad sack.)
5.) 4th and 14 at ATL 23 (1:41) #8 Shaub in at QB (Shotgun) M.Schaub pass incomplete to R.White (A.Dyson).
So let's see... a run for no gain, a pass that drew an interference call in the end zone, a subsequent 1-yard TD run, a successful 2-point conversion pass, and an incompletion on a tough 4th and long (which he inherited from Vick). Really, only on the 4th down play could you possibly say that maybe, MAYBE, there's a chance Vick could have scrambled around and found an open receiver or run for the first down. But you could say that on any play in any game about any player that comes out due to an injury. And yet this "expert" claims that had Vick stayed in, the Seahawks might have choked the game away?
So the question remains.. Have I regained faith in the Seahawks after a gutsy win against Atlanta? Their defense stepped up and played a great game. Combine that with the fact that Jacksonville gave the Colts a tough game in Indy, and maybe Seattle is better than people think. Maybe the Jags defense really is THAT good. If Seattle is for real, they should smash the Kurt Warner led Cardinals this Sunday at home. The Arizona offensive line is awful. Their running game has been non-existent. And Warner is as inmobile, sack-prone, and turnover-happy as ever. They need to win that game by at least 10, and then maybe my faith will be restored. For now.
I mean, I guess these guys don't watch every single game every single week (although I would if that was my full-time job). But they should at least investigate a bit more before making such blanket statements like this one...
In this week's SI Power Rankings, Dr. Z ranked the Seahawks at #12, and had this to say:
"They almost did it again, that fourth quarter fade. If Michael Vick had stayed in, who knows?"
If Vick had stayed in?!?! Vick missed all of 5 snaps the entire game. One of which was a 2-point conversion try. Backup Matt Schaub (who many of the same experts claim could be a starter in several teams in the league) came in for Vick. Here's the recap of those snaps Vick missed:
1.) 2nd and 5 at SEA 5 (4:41) #8 Schaub in at QB W.Dunn up the middle to SEA 5 for no gain (K.Hamlin, J.Sharper).
2.) 3rd and 5 at SEA 5 (4:06) M.Schaub pass incomplete to B.Finneran.
PENALTY on SEA-A.Dyson, Defensive Pass Interference, 4 yards, enforced at SEA 5 - No Play.
3.) 1st and 1 at SEA 1 (4:01) T.Duckett right guard for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN.
4.) TWO-POINT CONVERSION ATTEMPT. M.Schaub pass to A.Crumpler is complete. ATTEMPT SUCCEEDS.
(NOTE: Vick was back in for the final drive, and only left again on 4th and long, after he took a bad sack.)
5.) 4th and 14 at ATL 23 (1:41) #8 Shaub in at QB (Shotgun) M.Schaub pass incomplete to R.White (A.Dyson).
So let's see... a run for no gain, a pass that drew an interference call in the end zone, a subsequent 1-yard TD run, a successful 2-point conversion pass, and an incompletion on a tough 4th and long (which he inherited from Vick). Really, only on the 4th down play could you possibly say that maybe, MAYBE, there's a chance Vick could have scrambled around and found an open receiver or run for the first down. But you could say that on any play in any game about any player that comes out due to an injury. And yet this "expert" claims that had Vick stayed in, the Seahawks might have choked the game away?
So the question remains.. Have I regained faith in the Seahawks after a gutsy win against Atlanta? Their defense stepped up and played a great game. Combine that with the fact that Jacksonville gave the Colts a tough game in Indy, and maybe Seattle is better than people think. Maybe the Jags defense really is THAT good. If Seattle is for real, they should smash the Kurt Warner led Cardinals this Sunday at home. The Arizona offensive line is awful. Their running game has been non-existent. And Warner is as inmobile, sack-prone, and turnover-happy as ever. They need to win that game by at least 10, and then maybe my faith will be restored. For now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)